There are moments that can’t be contemplated: the little tragedies and concerns, the unexpected deviations of a routine. You strive to plan for all contingencies; but fate doesn’t favor preparation. It instead seeks to mock it, tossing unavoidable — and all too frustrating — situations toward you. And such situations often leave you without the necessary access to the foods you crave.
You are a Vegan. Your beliefs demand a life without animal products or tastes, rely instead on natural supplements. This isn’t always an easy philosophy, however. There are times when you are suddenly without food (surrounded instead to Carnivore menus, with no chance of finding relief). A dilemma then plagues you — eat what you despise or go without and suffer.
This debate is all too familiar: and it is known as the Paris Exemption.
Offered as an alternative theory, the Paris Exemption states that individuals should not confine themselves to pure Veganism during difficult situations (such as while traveling and being unable to find their usual fare). It encourages all to instead consider animal by-products, such as eggs, honey and cheese.
This has caused endless controversy throughout the realm of Veganism. Many deem it to be contrary to the established rules. The intention is not to defy the laws of natural living, however; it is instead to ensure that individuals don’t starve themselves for the sake of the cause. It doesn’t recommend meat or similar items. It simply lessens the requirements, ensuring that essential vitamins can be achieved. This is a survival method only.
The Paris Exemption allows Vegans to examine their beliefs — determining whether morality or sustenance is more important.
